전체 : 139,093
오늘 : 94
어제 : 102


전체 : 2,751,809
오늘 : 322
어제 : 334
  • 전체
  • Korean
  • Regional

I have several principles of my personal approaches on open access.

The diversity is the one. Diverse views, approaches, solutions and so many different reasons against some strategies by others. Publishing new gold OA journals is one but this strategy produced too much and widespread increase of scholarly articles which is major adverse effect of OA. German and Dutch approaches are what I love. Transforming current best journals to OA is difficult but we should do it. Repositories are also important and that is what libraries can contribute. OA strategy of funding agencies is important but many of them are ignorant on the real OA. Libraries are sometimes obstacles rather than supporters because they worries about cutting library budget. Diverse views have to be respected and are subject to be negotiated rather than rejected.

Researcher oriented approach is the second. Researchers are producers and readers of scholarly articles. The main target of the current OA is on scholarly journals and scholarly researchers are main customers of these journals. Although OA work is to help researchers, main problems are again researchers. Researchers are not very interested and sometimes ignorant on open access. They are very much selected people with narrow vision and they are not interested in any issues other than their specialty area. So it is hard to have researchers participate our open access initiatives. So alternative is to have general public to participate. It is true that general public is now becoming customers of scholarly articles like papers written by Obama the president. We should open this OA issue to become an issue of all people not limited to scholars. But our basic stance is from the researchers’ view.

The third is the data driven action. We should produce more data. The value, the usage, the current status, the effect and future. My current study is to produce data on how many journals are really used by researchers in my university based on citation analysis. This study deals with any articles with different document types not limited to articles from OA journals. My university subscribe more than 35,000 journals but my study shows that the number of journals used in their research papers as articles in their references is 12,000-16,000. So more than 20,000 journals are subscribed but never used in our paper. Downloads and accesses are data produced by publishers but citation data is really important. Nobody denies the more the better is resources are enough but the cost for the current subscription by our library is too high. Data on the finance of the library is also important but they are seldom released by librarians. We use 9 million U$ per year for subscription and additional 2 million U$ for APC in 2015. This figure is more than 10 fold increase compared to 1995.

The fourth is collaboration. Any parties are not strong enough to act for OA. Researchers are strong and important but there are only a few among researchers who have that passion and understanding on OA. Librarians are supportive on some selective aspects of OA. Government and fund raising organs do not understand the complexity of issues. Publishers are Janus. But we should cooperate and negotiate with any parties involved rather than excluding any from the activities. One last but probably the most important parties are internet portal and media. Access to open access articles should be improved through internet portals like Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic and Naver Academic. For most internet portals scholarly information is a small piece among many different coverage but the value is enormous. The bright prospect of Korean open access is Naver Academic which will value up the global open access in the near future.


서울대학교 의과대학 병리학교실 교수

우촌심뇌혈관연구재단 이사장

대한심장학회 심장병리연구회 회장

아시아태평양의학학술지편집인협의회 부회장


Jeong-Wook SEO, MD
Professor, Department of Pathology 

Seoul National University College of Medicine

Chairman, Woochon Cardio-Neuro-Vascular Research Foundation

Executive Vice-president, Asia Pacific Association of Medical Journal Editors (APAME)

Tel: +82-2-740-8268+82-2-740-8268
Fax: +82-2-743-5530
Mobile: +82-10-2666-8268+82-10-2666-8268
E-mail: jwseo@snu.ac.kr


You'll need Skype CreditFree via Skype
엮인글 :
문서 첨부 제한 : 0Byte/ 10.00MB
파일 크기 제한 : 10.00MB (허용 확장자 : *.*)
List of Articles

Korean [C-Story] 초연결의 시대와 공유저작물의 미래 (2017.05+06) file

인공 지능 시대의 창작이란 무엇인가? 창작자의 권리가 지켜지고 있는가? 창작물의 가치가 지켜지고 있는가? 창작물에 대한 저작권의 요건이 되는 “인간의 사상과 철학”이란 과연 무엇인가? 이런저런 분야의 업무는 인공 지능으로 대체되고 그런 직업은 소멸할 것이라고 하고, 창작 분야에서도 인간이 필요 없는 시...

Korean 초연결의 시대와 공유저작물의 미래 - ‘오픈액세스’가 대세인가 대안인가? file

자신의 저작물에 대하여 저자가 권리를 갖는다는 지극히 상식적인 논리가 저작권의 기본 개념이다. 그러나 이 개념은 저작권법의 태생 단계에서 지금까지 엇박자를 일으키고 있다. 유럽에서 저작권법이 탄생한 것은 저자를 대신하여 저자의 이익을 보장하는 출판사의 권리를 지켜주는 법으로 시작되었다. 즉 저자권...

Regional My principles on Open Access 2017

I have several principles of my personal approaches on open access. The diversity is the one. Diverse views, approaches, solutions and so many different reasons against some strategies by others. Publishing new gold OA journals is one but this strategy produced too much and widespread incr...

Korean 독일의 오픈액세스 file

Germany-wide consortium of research libraries announce boycott of Elsevier journals over open access 독일 도서관 연합: 오픈 액세스를 거부하는 엘스비어 저널 구독을 보이콧.BOINGBOING/ CORY DOCTOROW / 9:53 AM THU DEC 15, 2016 Germany's DEAL project, which includes over 60 major re...

Korean 대학도서관의 개혁을 요구합니다. Open Science 2016 발표자료 (3/3) file

오픈액세스에 대한 학자들의 노력은 지식을 공유하고 더 많은 사람들에게 베풀자는 뜻에서 시작되었습니다. 특히 국민의 세금으로 수행된 연구는 모든 국민, 그리고 전세계 모든 사람들이 이용할 수 있도록 하자는 OECD 선언에서 기본적인 철학을 확인할 수 있습니다. 소중한 지식을 공유하지 않는다면 과학자의 노력을 이...

Korean Open Science 2016 발표자료(2/3) file

Open Access의 현실과 문제점에 대한 다양한 시각을 보야줍니다. WHY? 라는 질문에 충분한 데이터와 분석, 사고가 필요합니다. 제3부 HOW? 도 꼭 읽어 주세요.

Korean Open Science 2016 발표자료(1/3) file

과학자들은 언제 흥분하나요? 데이터를 볼 때 흥분합니다. 데이터에 담겨 있는 진실은 우리 마음의 눈으로 머리의 통찰을 통해서 비로소 그 모습을 드러냅니다. 그리고 그 모습은 시대에 따라서, 그리고 보는 사람의 지식에 따라서 다른 모습을 합니다. 내가 관찰한 지식이 다른 사람에게는 달리 보이는 것. 그런데 ...

CCKOREA 웹사이트는 크리에이티브 커먼즈 저작자표시 2.0 대한민국 라이선스에 따라 이용할 수 있습니다.

Creative Commons 저작권 정책보기